
Mars Theran
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
252
|
Posted - 2012.06.27 07:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
Morgorathi wrote:MeBiatch wrote:Morgorathi wrote:Quote:A 1999 study by Hammer et al., published in the Proceedings of the United States National Academy of Sciences compared the Y chromosomes of Ashkenazi, Roman, North African, Kurdish, Near Eastern, Yemenite, and Ethiopian Jews with 16 non-Jewish groups from similar geographic locations. It found that "Despite their long-term residence in different countries and isolation from one another, most Jewish populations were not significantly different from one another at the genetic level... The results support the hypothesis that the paternal gene pools of Jewish communities from Europe, North Africa, and the Middle East descended from a common Middle Eastern ancestral population, and suggest that most Jewish communities have remained relatively isolated from neighboring non-Jewish communities during and after the Diaspora." Jewish descent is Matrilineal not Patrilineal. It may show that the males are of middle eastern and jewish descent but their children are not. oh fkcu i have to now bring in mitochondrial just to shut you up? ok here goes.... read the entire thing please first Quote:Before 2006, geneticists largely attributed the genesis of most of the world's Jewish populations, including Ashkenazi Jews, to founding effects by males who migrated from the Middle East and "by the women from each local population whom they took as wives and converted to Judaism." In line with this model of origin, David Goldstein, now of Duke University, reported in 2002 that, unlike male lineages, the female lineages in Ashkenazi Jewish communities "did not seem to be Middle Eastern", and that each community had its own genetic pattern and even that "in some cases the mitochondrial DNA was closely related to that of the host community." In his view this suggested "that Jewish men had arrived from the Middle East, taken wives from the host population and converted them to Judaism, after which there was no further intermarriage with non-Jews."[46] However, a 2006 study by Behar et al.,[1] based on high-resolution analysis of haplogroup K(mtDNA), suggested that about 40% of the current Ashkenazi population is descended matrilineally from just four women, or "founder lineages", that were "likely from a Hebrew/Levantine mtDNA pool" originating in the Middle East in the 1st and 2nd centuries CE. Although Haplogroup K is common throughout western Eurasia, "the observed global pattern of distribution renders very unlikely the possibility that the four aforementioned founder lineages entered the Ashkenazi mtDNA pool via gene flow from a European host population: "..Both the extent and location of the maternal ancestral deme from which the Ashkenazi Jewry arose remain obscure. Here, using complete sequences of the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), we show that close to one-half of Ashkenazi Jews, estimated at 8,000,000 people, can be traced back to only four women carrying distinct mtDNAs that are virtually absent in other populations, with the important exception of low frequencies among non-Ashkenazi Jews. We conclude that four founding mtDNAs, likely of Near Eastern ancestry, underwent major expansion(s) in Europe within the past millennium.."[1][46] In addition, Behar et al. have suggested that the rest of Ashkenazi mtDNA is originated from ~150 women, most of those likely of Middle Eastern origin.[1] However, other studies by Behar indicate that this mtDNA is different from other Jewish populations found outside of Europe, leaving the possibility of a separate origin or even a European origin a distinct possibility Can you get me a non-jewish study? Not that i doubt its credibility but its like asking the ***** about the heritage of the aryan people. "ARYANS ARE PURE BLOODED ARYANS. NO INTERMIXING. WE ARE PURE. NEVER INTERMIXED"
You are aware that DNA doesn't give a **** if you believe in matrilineal or patrilineal descent from parents to children right? To put it quite bluntly, what you believe is completely irrelevent and dna will do its own thing based on natural order.
That basically boils down to this: Both parents are equally responsible for the genetic make-up of their descendents. As a factor of evolution, children will be very marginally different from both parents in genetic make-up. Philosophy, religion, culture and the rest have no impact on DNA, with exception to the conditions created by culture and ritual that will impact evolution as an Environmental factor..
That can mean specific diet, use of various substances, regular and dynamic socially aggressive or passive behaviour, etc.. will have some impact on genetic evolution over a period of time, just like specific ecological and environmental changes can have an effect on this provided they are constant enough and exposure to them is over a span of generations. I have deleted and cleared my signature 7 times and it still won't go away. |